Integrating Regulatory Compliance Elements into the Protocol

TL;DR

In the world of oracle state synchronization, regulatory compliance is not optional but essential. Integrating regulatory compliance mechanisms into the Oracle Interoperability Protocol (OIP) represents a fundamental challenge for implementing tokenized capital markets. This research presents a concrete technical approach to realizing the five core principles of the Regulatory Compliance Protocol (RCP)—completeness, traceability, confidentiality, enforceability, and tokenizability—in an on-chain environment through a NEW-EIP proposal that extends the ERC-1400 security token standard. We provide detailed explanations of how automated verification and enforcement mechanisms for regulatory compliance can be implemented by extending the ERC-1643 document management standard and the ERC-1644 controller operations standard.

---

1. Introduction: The Intersection of OIP and Regulatory Compliance

The Oracle Interoperability Protocol (OIP), Oraclizer’s core technology, is not merely a data connection protocol but a framework that enables complete state synchronization between on-chain and off-chain worlds. However, for state synchronization to have meaning in tokenized capital markets, regulatory compliance is an essential element. Without regulatory compliance, no interoperability technology can possess real value.

The process of integrating regulatory compliance elements into the OIP protocol must begin not as a simple feature addition, but from the fundamental design philosophy of the protocol. The OIP message format introduced in previous articles already includes basic structures for regulatory compliance, but this article delves deeper into how regulatory compliance elements are integrated into OIP from an implementation perspective.

In particular, we will focus on how to implement the five core principles of the Regulatory Compliance Protocol (RCP) in an on-chain environment through a NEW-EIP proposal that extends the existing ERC-1400 security token standard.

2. Understanding and Limitations of ERC-1400

2.1 Components of ERC-1400

ERC-1400 is an “umbrella” standard for security tokens, encompassing several sub-standards. Each sub-standard addresses different aspects of security token functionality:

• ERC-1410: Differentiated ownership and transparent restrictions (Partially Fungible Token)
• ERC-1594: On-chain restriction checks, off-chain data injection, issuance/redemption functionality
• ERC-1643: Document management standard
• ERC-1644: Controller operations (forced transfer) standard

This composition offers a modular approach, allowing flexible application across various regulatory environments and asset types.

2.2 Limitations of ERC-1400

However, ERC-1400 has several limitations that must be overcome for full regulatory compliance in modern financial regulatory environments:

• Limited regulatory mechanisms: Provides only a single controllerTransfer function, making it impossible to distinguish between different regulatory actions
• Lack of cross-chain support: Design considers only single-chain environments, limiting its application in modern blockchain ecosystems
• Partial regulatory gaps: Fails to meet many of the latest regulatory requirements
• Insufficient differentiation by asset class: Inadequate reflection of unique regulatory requirements for various asset classes

3. RCP-Based Regulatory Compliance Integration Architecture

To integrate the five core principles of RCP (completeness, traceability, confidentiality, enforceability, tokenizability) into OIP, we propose the following technical approach.

3.1 Regulatory Compliance Layer Architecture

The regulatory compliance layer within OIP consists of multiple interconnected modules, each responsible for implementing specific aspects of the RCP principles.

3.2 Core Modules of the Regulatory Compliance Layer

The compliance layer contains the following key modules:

• Completeness Module:
  • State transition validation
  • Transaction atomicity guarantee
  • Contract completeness assurance
• Traceability Module:
  • System-wide AML implementation
  • Audit trail system
  • Cross-chain state tracking
• Confidentiality Module:
  • ZK proof-based privacy
  • Need-to-know information disclosure limitation
  • Data minimization strategy
• Enforceability Module:
  • Regulatory action execution (FREEZE, SEIZE, CONFISCATE, etc.)
  • Regulatory authority permission management
  • Regulatory action priority processing
• Tokenizability Module:
  • RWA tokenization standards
  • Asset class-specific regulatory rules
  • Cross-chain token representation

4. Extending ERC-1643: Regulatory Compliance Through Document Management

ERC-1643 provides a standard interface for attaching and managing documents in security token contracts. Let’s examine how this standard can be extended to enhance regulatory compliance.

4.1 Existing ERC-1643 Interface

/// @title IERC1643 Document Management
interface IERC1643 {
    // Document Management
    function getDocument(bytes32 _name) external view returns (string, bytes32, uint256);
    function setDocument(bytes32 _name, string _uri, bytes32 _documentHash) external;
    function removeDocument(bytes32 _name) external;
    function getAllDocuments() external view returns (bytes32[]);

    // Events
    event DocumentRemoved(bytes32 indexed _name, string _uri, bytes32 _documentHash);
    event DocumentUpdated(bytes32 indexed _name, string _uri, bytes32 _documentHash);
}

4.2 RCP Extended Interface (IERC1643RCP)

Here’s an extended interface for ERC-1643 with regulatory compliance features:

/// @title IERC1643RCP Enhanced Document Management with Regulatory Compliance
interface IERC1643RCP is IERC1643 {
    /// @notice Document types for regulatory compliance
    enum DocumentType {
        OFFERING,           // Offering documents
        LEGAL,              // Legal agreements
        REGULATORY,         // Regulatory filings
        DISCLOSURE,         // Disclosure documents
        COMPLIANCE,         // Compliance reports
        AUDIT,              // Audit reports
        KYC_AML,            // KYC/AML procedures
        TECHNICAL           // Technical specifications
    }

    /// @notice Regulatory jurisdiction identifiers
    enum Jurisdiction {
        GLOBAL,             // Global regulations
        US_SEC,             // US Securities and Exchange Commission
        EU_ESMA,            // European Securities and Markets Authority
        UK_FCA,             // UK Financial Conduct Authority
        SG_MAS,             // Singapore Monetary Authority
        JP_FSA,             // Japan Financial Services Agency
        OTHER               // Other jurisdictions
    }

    /// @notice Document validity status
    enum ValidityStatus {
        VALID,              // Document is valid
        EXPIRED,            // Document has expired
        SUPERSEDED,         // Document has been superseded
        REVOKED             // Document has been revoked
    }

    /// @notice Enhanced document structure
    struct RegulatoryDocument {
        bytes32 name;
        string uri;
        bytes32 documentHash;
        uint256 timestamp;
        DocumentType docType;
        Jurisdiction jurisdiction;
        uint256 validUntil;
        ValidityStatus status;
        address issuer;
        bytes signature;        // Issuer's signature of document hash
    }

    /// @notice Get a document with full regulatory metadata
    /// @param _name Document name/identifier
    /// @return Document details with regulatory metadata
    function getRegulatoryDocument(bytes32 _name) external view 
        returns (RegulatoryDocument memory);

    /// @notice Set a document with regulatory metadata
    /// @param _document The regulatory document to set
    function setRegulatoryDocument(RegulatoryDocument calldata _document) external;

    /// @notice Get all documents of a specific type
    /// @param _docType The document type to filter by
    /// @return Array of document identifiers of the specified type
    function getDocumentsByType(DocumentType _docType) external view 
        returns (bytes32[] memory);

    /// @notice Get all documents for a specific jurisdiction
    /// @param _jurisdiction The jurisdiction to filter by
    /// @return Array of document identifiers for the specified jurisdiction
    function getDocumentsByJurisdiction(Jurisdiction _jurisdiction) external view 
        returns (bytes32[] memory);

    /// @notice Verify if token has all required regulatory documents
    /// @return true if all required documents are present and valid
    function hasRequiredRegulatoryDocuments() external view returns (bool);

    /// @notice Set document validity status
    /// @param _name Document name/identifier
    /// @param _status New validity status
    function setDocumentValidity(bytes32 _name, ValidityStatus _status) external;

    /// @notice Document validity status changed event
    event DocumentValidityChanged(
        bytes32 indexed _name, 
        ValidityStatus _oldStatus, 
        ValidityStatus _newStatus,
        address indexed _changedBy
    );

    /// @notice Enhanced document update event with regulatory metadata
    event RegulatoryDocumentUpdated(
        bytes32 indexed _name,
        DocumentType indexed _docType,
        Jurisdiction indexed _jurisdiction,
        uint256 _validUntil,
        address _issuer
    );
}

This extended interface adds crucial regulatory metadata to documents, including document types, jurisdictions, validity periods, and authorization signatures. It also provides functions to query documents by type or jurisdiction and verify regulatory compliance status.

4.3 Regulatory Document Manager Implementation

Here’s an example implementation of the extended document management interface:

/// @title RegulatoryDocumentManager
/// @notice Implementation of IERC1643RCP for managing regulatory documents
contract RegulatoryDocumentManager is IERC1643RCP {
    // Access control
    address public documentController;
    address public regulatoryAuthority;

    // Required document types based on asset class
    mapping(bytes32 => DocumentType[]) private _requiredDocuments;

    // Document storage
    mapping(bytes32 => RegulatoryDocument) private _documents;
    mapping(DocumentType => bytes32[]) private _documentsByType;
    mapping(Jurisdiction => bytes32[]) private _documentsByJurisdiction;
    bytes32[] private _allDocuments;

    // Asset class identifier
    bytes32 public assetClass;

    modifier onlyDocumentController() {
        require(
            msg.sender == documentController,
            "RegulatoryDocumentManager: caller is not the document controller"
        );
        _;
    }

    modifier onlyRegulatoryAuthority() {
        require(
            msg.sender == regulatoryAuthority,
            "RegulatoryDocumentManager: caller is not the regulatory authority"
        );
        _;
    }

    constructor(
        address _documentController,
        address _regulatoryAuthority,
        bytes32 _assetClass
    ) {
        documentController = _documentController;
        regulatoryAuthority = _regulatoryAuthority;
        assetClass = _assetClass;

        // Set required documents based on asset class
        _setupRequiredDocuments(_assetClass);
    }

    /// @notice Configure required documents based on asset class
    function _setupRequiredDocuments(bytes32 _assetClass) private {
        // Example: Equity securities require specific documents
        if (_assetClass == keccak256("EQUITY")) {
            _requiredDocuments[_assetClass] = [
                DocumentType.OFFERING,
                DocumentType.LEGAL,
                DocumentType.REGULATORY,
                DocumentType.DISCLOSURE
            ];
        }
        // Example: Debt securities require specific documents
        else if (_assetClass == keccak256("DEBT")) {
            _requiredDocuments[_assetClass] = [
                DocumentType.OFFERING,
                DocumentType.LEGAL,
                DocumentType.DISCLOSURE
            ];
        }
        // Default requirements for all asset types
        else {
            _requiredDocuments[_assetClass] = [
                DocumentType.OFFERING,
                DocumentType.LEGAL
            ];
        }
    }

    // Implementation of core functions...
}

5. Extending ERC-1644: Implementing Regulatory Enforceability

ERC-1644 is a standard that supports controller operations (forced transfers). We can extend this standard to implement the ‘enforceability’ principle of RCP.

5.1 Existing ERC-1644 Interface

/// @title IERC1644 Controller Token Operation Standard
interface IERC1644 {
    // Controller Operation
    function isControllable() external view returns (bool);
    function controllerTransfer(
        address _from,
        address _to,
        uint256 _value,
        bytes _data,
        bytes _operatorData
    ) external;
    function controllerRedeem(
        address _tokenHolder,
        uint256 _value,
        bytes _data,
        bytes _operatorData
    ) external;

    // Controller Events
    event ControllerTransfer(
        address _controller,
        address indexed _from,
        address indexed _to,
        uint256 _value,
        bytes _data,
        bytes _operatorData
    );
    event ControllerRedemption(
        address _controller,
        address indexed _tokenHolder,
        uint256 _value,
        bytes _data,
        bytes _operatorData
    );
}

5.2 RCP Extended Interface (IERC1644RCP)

Here’s an extended interface for ERC-1644 with enhanced regulatory action capabilities:

/// @title IERC1644RCP Enhanced Controller Operations with Regulatory Actions
interface IERC1644RCP is IERC1644 {
    /// @notice Types of regulatory actions
    enum RegulatoryActionType {
        FREEZE,         // Temporarily suspend transfers
        SEIZE,          // Court-ordered custody
        CONFISCATE,     // Permanent ownership removal
        LIQUIDATE,      // Force liquidation at market price
        RESTRICT,       // Apply transfer restrictions
        RECOVER         // Recover from theft/fraud
    }

    /// @notice Status of a regulatory action
    enum ActionStatus {
        PENDING,        // Action is pending execution
        ACTIVE,         // Action is currently active
        COMPLETED,      // Action has been completed
        CANCELLED       // Action has been cancelled
    }

    /// @notice Regulatory action details
    struct RegulatoryAction {
        uint256 actionId;
        RegulatoryActionType actionType;
        address targetAddress;
        uint256 tokenAmount;
        address destinationAddress;  // For transfer actions
        uint256 expirationTime;      // For temporary actions
        string reason;
        bytes32 orderReference;      // Reference to legal order
        bytes32 documentReference;   // Reference to supporting document
        address regulatoryAuthority;
        uint256 timestamp;
        ActionStatus status;
    }

    /// @notice Get all regulatory authorities
    /// @return Array of regulatory authority addresses
    function getRegulatoryAuthorities() external view returns (address[] memory);

    /// @notice Check if address is a regulatory authority
    /// @param _authority Address to check
    /// @return True if the address is a regulatory authority
    function isRegulatoryAuthority(address _authority) external view returns (bool);

    /// @notice Add a regulatory authority
    /// @param _authority Address of the authority to add
    function addRegulatoryAuthority(address _authority) external;

    /// @notice Remove a regulatory authority
    /// @param _authority Address of the authority to remove
    function removeRegulatoryAuthority(address _authority) external;

    /// @notice Execute a regulatory action
    /// @param _action The regulatory action to execute
    /// @return actionId The ID of the executed action
    function executeRegulatoryAction(RegulatoryAction calldata _action) 
        external returns (uint256);

    /// @notice Cancel a regulatory action
    /// @param _actionId The ID of the action to cancel
    function cancelRegulatoryAction(uint256 _actionId) external;

    /// @notice Get a regulatory action by ID
    /// @param _actionId The ID of the action
    /// @return The regulatory action details
    function getRegulatoryAction(uint256 _actionId) 
        external view returns (RegulatoryAction memory);

    /// @notice Get all active regulatory actions for an address
    /// @param _address The address to query
    /// @return Array of active regulatory action IDs
    function getActiveActionsForAddress(address _address) 
        external view returns (uint256[] memory);

    /// @notice Check if an address is restricted
    /// @param _address The address to check
    /// @return True if the address has any active restrictions
    function isAddressRestricted(address _address) external view returns (bool);

    // Events...
}

This extension defines six distinct regulatory action types that provide much more granular control than the original standard’s single controller action. Each action type has different semantics and legal implications:

• FREEZE: Temporarily suspends transfers, can be lifted later
• SEIZE: Court-ordered custody where ownership remains but control is transferred
• CONFISCATE: Permanent ownership removal for illegal assets
• LIQUIDATE: Forced sale at market price to settle obligations
• RESTRICT: Applies specific conditions to transfers
• RECOVER: Returns assets to rightful owner in case of theft or fraud

5.3 Regulatory Enforcement Controller Implementation

Here’s an example implementation of the extended controller operations interface:

/// @title RegulatoryEnforcementController
/// @notice Implementation of IERC1644RCP for regulatory enforcement
contract RegulatoryEnforcementController is IERC1644RCP {
    // Token interface for controller operations
    IERC20 private _token;

    // Super controller (e.g., token issuer)
    address public superController;

    // Regulatory authorities
    mapping(address => bool) private _regulatoryAuthorities;
    address[] private _authoritiesList;

    // Regulatory actions
    mapping(uint256 => RegulatoryAction) private _regulatoryActions;
    uint256 private _nextActionId = 1;

    // Active actions by address
    mapping(address => uint256[]) private _activeActionsByAddress;

    // Action type priority (higher number = higher priority)
    mapping(RegulatoryActionType => uint8) private _actionTypePriority;

    // Events for controllable status
    event ControllableStatusChanged(bool _newStatus);

    modifier onlySuperController() {
        require(
            msg.sender == superController,
            "RegulatoryEnforcementController: caller is not the super controller"
        );
        _;
    }

    modifier onlyRegulatoryAuthority() {
        require(
            _regulatoryAuthorities[msg.sender],
            "RegulatoryEnforcementController: caller is not a regulatory authority"
        );
        _;
    }

    constructor(address _tokenAddress, address _superController) {
        _token = IERC20(_tokenAddress);
        superController = _superController;

        // Add super controller as a regulatory authority
        _regulatoryAuthorities[_superController] = true;
        _authoritiesList.push(_superController);

        // Set action type priorities
        _actionTypePriority[RegulatoryActionType.CONFISCATE] = 100;
        _actionTypePriority[RegulatoryActionType.SEIZE] = 90;
        _actionTypePriority[RegulatoryActionType.FREEZE] = 80;
        _actionTypePriority[RegulatoryActionType.LIQUIDATE] = 70;
        _actionTypePriority[RegulatoryActionType.RESTRICT] = 60;
        _actionTypePriority[RegulatoryActionType.RECOVER] = 50;
    }

    // Implementation of core functions...
}

6. RWA Registry and OIP Integration

The RWA Registry is a key component connecting OIP with on-chain smart contracts. Here we explore how the RWA Registry integrates with ERC-1643RCP and ERC-1644RCP to implement regulatory compliance mechanisms.

6.1 RWA Registry Contract

The RWA Registry is a central registry that manages the state and regulatory compliance status of real-world assets (RWA) on-chain. It serves as the single source of truth for the state of tokenized real-world assets.

/// @title RWARegistry
/// @notice Central registry for Real World Assets with regulatory compliance
contract RWARegistry {
    // Regulatory document manager
    RegulatoryDocumentManager public documentManager;

    // Regulatory enforcement controller
    RegulatoryEnforcementController public enforcementController;

    // Asset registration
    struct Asset {
        bytes32 assetId;
        address tokenContract;
        string assetType;
        string jurisdiction;
        uint256 registrationTime;
        bytes32 documentReference;
        bool active;
    }

    // Asset storage
    mapping(bytes32 => Asset) private _assets;
    bytes32[] private _assetIds;

    // Asset compliance status
    mapping(bytes32 => bool) private _assetCompliance;

    // Asset by token contract
    mapping(address => bytes32) private _assetByToken;

    // Events
    event AssetRegistered(
        bytes32 indexed assetId,
        address indexed tokenContract,
        string assetType,
        string jurisdiction
    );

    // Additional events...

    constructor(
        address _documentManager,
        address _enforcementController
    ) {
        documentManager = RegulatoryDocumentManager(_documentManager);
        enforcementController = RegulatoryEnforcementController(_enforcementController);
    }

    // Implementation of core functions...
}

6.2 OIP and RWA Registry Integration Mechanism

Integration between OIP and the RWA Registry is primarily achieved through the Oracle State Synchronizer (OSS). The integration process includes:

/// @title OIPRWAIntegration
/// @notice Integration between OIP and RWA Registry
contract OIPRWAIntegration {
    // RWA Registry
    RWARegistry public rwaRegistry;

    // OSS interface (simplified)
    interface IOSS {
        function verifyStateTransition(
            bytes32 assetId,
            bytes32 oldStateRoot,
            bytes32 newStateRoot,
            bytes calldata proof
        ) external returns (bool);

        function getLatestStateRoot(bytes32 assetId) external view returns (bytes32);
    }

    IOSS public oss;

    // State roots by asset
    mapping(bytes32 => bytes32) private _stateRoots;

    // Events
    event StateRootUpdated(
        bytes32 indexed assetId,
        bytes32 oldStateRoot,
        bytes32 newStateRoot,
        uint256 timestamp
    );

    constructor(address _rwaRegistry, address _oss) {
        rwaRegistry = RWARegistry(_rwaRegistry);
        oss = IOSS(_oss);
    }

    // Implementation of core functions...
}

7. Technical Implementation of Regulatory Compliance Actions

Now we’ll focus on the ‘enforceability’ principle of RCP’s five core principles and examine the technical implementation of regulatory compliance actions in detail.

7.1 Regulatory Action Types and Implementation Principles

The implementation principles for the six regulatory action types (FREEZE, SEIZE, CONFISCATE, LIQUIDATE, RESTRICT, RECOVER) defined in ERC-1644RCP follow a structured flow:

1. Action Request: A regulatory authority submits an action request
2. Authorization Check: The system verifies the authority’s credentials
3. Priority Resolution: Conflicting actions are resolved based on priority
4. Action Execution: The specific action logic is executed
5. State Update: The token and registry state is updated
6. Event Emission: Transparent notification of the action

7.2 Example Implementation of Regulatory Actions

The following code excerpt shows how regulatory actions are implemented in a security token contract:

/// @notice Handle regulatory actions
/// @param actionType Type of regulatory action
/// @param target Target address
/// @param amount Token amount
/// @param destination Destination address (for transfers)
/// @return True if the action was successful
function handleRegulatoryAction(
    uint8 actionType, // RegulatoryActionType as uint8
    address target,
    uint256 amount,
    address destination
) external returns (bool) {
    // Only enforcement controller can execute regulatory actions
    require(
        msg.sender == address(enforcementController),
        "Only enforcement controller can execute regulatory actions"
    );

    // Convert uint8 to RegulatoryActionType
    RegulatoryActionType action = RegulatoryActionType(actionType);

    if (action == RegulatoryActionType.FREEZE) {
        // Freeze account
        _frozen[target] = true;
        emit AccountFrozen(target, true);
        return true;
    }
    else if (action == RegulatoryActionType.SEIZE) {
        // Transfer tokens to regulatory custody
        if (destination != address(0)) {
            _transfer(target, destination, amount);
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }
    else if (action == RegulatoryActionType.CONFISCATE) {
        // Permanently remove tokens
        if (destination != address(0)) {
            _transfer(target, destination, amount);
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }
    else if (action == RegulatoryActionType.LIQUIDATE) {
        // Implementation-specific: Connect to exchange or auction
        // This would typically involve an external mechanism
        return false;
    }
    else if (action == RegulatoryActionType.RESTRICT) {
        // Apply transfer restrictions
        if (destination != address(0)) {
            _transferRestrictions[target][destination] = true;
            emit TransferRestricted(target, destination, true);
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }
    else if (action == RegulatoryActionType.RECOVER) {
        // Return tokens to rightful owner
        if (destination != address(0)) {
            _transfer(target, destination, amount);
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }

    return false;
}

8. NEW-EIP Proposal: RCP-Based Security Token Standard

Integrating the various components we’ve explored, we propose a new security token standard based on RCP, named NEW-EIP.

8.1 NEW-EIP Overview

/// @title ERC-RCP: Regulatory Compliance Protocol for Security Tokens
/// @dev Extension of ERC-1400 with enhanced regulatory compliance features
interface IERCRCP {
    // Core security token functionality (ERC-1594)
    // Partially fungible token functionality (ERC-1410)
    // Document management functionality (ERC-1643RCP)
    // Controller operation functionality (ERC-1644RCP)

    /// @notice Check token compliance status
    /// @return compliance status and additional information
    function checkCompliance() external view returns (bool, bytes memory);

    /// @notice Get regulatory information
    /// @return Regulatory information including jurisdictions and requirements
    function getRegulatoryInfo() external view returns (bytes memory);

    /// @notice Execute a regulatory action
    /// @param actionType Type of regulatory action
    /// @param target Target address
    /// @param amount Token amount
    /// @param destination Destination address (for transfers)
    /// @param data Additional data
    /// @return success True if the action was successful
    function executeRegulatoryAction(
        uint8 actionType,
        address target,
        uint256 amount,
        address destination,
        bytes calldata data
    ) external returns (bool);

    // Events...
}

8.2 RCP-Based Standard Implementation Example

/// @title ERC-RCP Implementation
/// @notice Implementation of ERC-RCP standard
contract ERCRCP is 
    ERC1400, 
    IERCRCP, 
    RegulatoryDocumentManager, 
    RegulatoryEnforcementController 
{
    // Implementation would combine all components discussed previously

    // RWA Registry integration
    RWARegistry public rwaRegistry;
    bytes32 public assetId;

    // Compliance status
    bool private _compliant;

    constructor(
        // Various initialization parameters
    ) {
        // Initialize components
    }

    /// @notice Check token compliance status
    /// @return compliance status and additional information
    function checkCompliance() external view override returns (bool, bytes memory) {
        // Check document compliance
        bool hasDocuments = hasRequiredRegulatoryDocuments();

        // Check RWA Registry compliance
        (bool registryCompliant, bytes32 restrictions) = rwaRegistry.checkAssetCompliance(assetId);

        // Combined compliance status
        bool compliant = _compliant && hasDocuments && registryCompliant;

        // Additional information
        bytes memory info;
        if (!compliant) {
            // Encode reason for non-compliance
            if (!_compliant) {
                info = abi.encode("Basic compliance check failed");
            }
            else if (!hasDocuments) {
                info = abi.encode("Missing required regulatory documents");
            }
            else if (!registryCompliant) {
                info = abi.encode("RWA Registry compliance check failed", restrictions);
            }
        }

        return (compliant, info);
    }

    // Additional implementations...
}

This NEW-EIP proposal integrates the extended document management (ERC-1643RCP) and controller operations (ERC-1644RCP) standards with additional compliance-specific functionality. It provides a comprehensive framework for security tokens that meets modern regulatory requirements.

9. Conclusion and Future Research Directions

9.1 Key Research Achievements

In this research, we’ve explored the technical integration of regulatory compliance mechanisms into the Oracle Interoperability Protocol (OIP). Through a NEW-EIP proposal extending the ERC-1400 security token standard, we’ve demonstrated how to implement the five core principles of the Regulatory Compliance Protocol (RCP) to address the key challenges of state synchronization in tokenized capital markets.

Key achievements include:

• Extended Document Management Standard: Enhanced ERC-1643 to support management, verification, and updating of regulatory documents
• Granular Regulatory Actions: Extended ERC-1644 to define and implement six distinct regulatory action types
• RWA Registry Integration: Designed effective integration mechanisms between on-chain RWA Registry and OIP
• Integrated Framework: Proposed NEW-EIP to provide a complete regulatory compliance solution integrating various components

9.2 Future Research Directions

Based on this research, we propose the following future research directions:

• Cross-Chain Regulatory Compliance Mechanisms: Research on ensuring consistency of regulatory compliance status across multiple blockchains
• Privacy-Preserving Regulatory Compliance: Research on using ZK proofs to verify regulatory compliance while preserving privacy
• Asset Class-Specific Regulatory Models: Development of specialized regulatory compliance models for different asset classes
• Direct Regulatory Authority Integration: Research on interfaces and protocols allowing regulatory authorities to directly perform regulatory actions on-chain
• Intent-Based Regulatory Compliance: Research on integrating regulatory compliance mechanisms with Intent standards like ERC-7683

9.3 Closing Thoughts

Integrating regulatory compliance elements into Oraclizer’s OIP is an essential step toward the practical implementation of tokenized capital markets. The approaches and technical implementation methodologies presented in this research are expected to make significant contributions to Oraclizer’s future development roadmap.

By technically implementing the five core principles of RCP, we have established a foundation for oracle state synchronization to create value in real financial markets beyond mere technical innovation. We expect this technical approach to narrow the gap between TradFi and DeFi and open new forms of digital asset markets.

---

References

[1] Ethereum Foundation. (2018). ERC-1400: Security Token Standard. https://github.com/ethereum/eips/issues/1411

[2] Ethereum Foundation. (2018). ERC-1643: Document Management Standard. https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/1643

[3] Ethereum Foundation. (2018). ERC-1644: Controller Token Operation Standard. https://github.com/ethereum/eips/issues/1644

[4] Polymath Network. (2021). ERC-1400: Evolution of a Security Token Standard. https://blog.polymath.network/erc-1400-evolution-of-a-security-token-standard-1e25d12b9261

[5] Tokenist. (2021). How the ERC-1400 Has Evolved Into a Suite of Interoperable Security Token Standards. https://tokenist.com/how-the-erc-1400-has-evolved-into-a-suite-of-interoperable-security-token-standards/

[6] Horizen Korea & Oraclizer Core. (2024). Regulatory Compliance Protocol (RCP) for Tokenized Capital Markets.

[7] Ethereum Foundation. (2023). ERC-7683: Intent-based Transactions. https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7683